Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow Me

Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation's Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Change for a New Era in Cancer Treatment

 

Change for a New Era in Cancer Treatment Alternative Cancer Treatment Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation

People look forward to New Year’s Day because it brings feelings of renewal, a promise of new beginnings and an acknowledgment for change. Most importantly, January 1st gives people a sense of hope. A hope that the New Year will bring prosperity and that perhaps major change will be made in our own lives.

Isn’t this is the idea behind New Year’s resolutions? Resolutions are made hoping that, if we create promises to ourselves, we’ll be held accountable; that we work diligently to change the things in our own lives that we find unacceptable. Things can often get complicated and they aren’t always simple, but we must start the process and take the steps to ensure that one day it will be different.

It's the beginning of 2013, and I propose that we all take a few moments to envision a new era; an age when treating cancer is not synonymous with harsh side effects or devastation. Some of us can remember back to a time when cancer wasn’t the epidemic that it is today. Others (and I fear most of us) have no idea what a world with no side effects would look like.

Let’s start that process.  Imagine a world where the words “chemotherapy” and “radiation” are no longer synonymous with a cancer diagnosis; a time when cancer is treated humanely and successfully.

Treating cancer without side effects means that children won’t have to see their parents suffer the debilitating result of using traditional chemotherapy. Parents won’t have to miss work or their child’s school program because they are too weak. Grandparents, aunts and uncles will have the chance to watch younger generations grow old.

Imagine an era when cancer patients of all ages will focus their energies on getting well and moving on with their lives instead of enduring lengthy treatments that cause side effects that are often worse than the very disease being treated.

I could go on and on about why cancer treatments need to be different but, you know that all too well. What we need is change. 

John Kanzius envisioned a change in cancer treatments when he saw how harsh current methods were on the children seated right next to him.  He knew there had to be “a better way” in how we treat cancer and that was when the Kanzius Noninvasive Radiowave Cancer Treatment was born. The methodology is simple: direct small metallic particles specifically to cancer cells and pass a controlled radiowave past them, which will heat up the metal and destroy the cancer without affecting the healthy, neighboring cells.

Who could have imagined that an idea so simple would treat a disease so complex?  Only the desperate, the daring, the tenacious.  Those who were willing to be accountable for the change that needs to take place. Followers of John’s “better way” make up the Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation.  They are a group who won’t accept a side effect as adequate.  They are enduring; willing to test and retest the methodology until it is proven “beyond doubt” under a scrutinizing FDA eye. They are believers.

The Kanzius Foundation believes in the hope that this change offers and that’s why we only fund research that will make the Kanzius Noninvasive Radiowave Cancer Treatment a reality. “A better way” is only possible if we believe, if we act, if we resolve to stand together to take the steps for change in cancer treatment. A new era for a cancer treatment with no side effects – a reality?

Yes! Do you believe?

If you would like to learn more about the mission of Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation and the research we support, watch our "Spread the Wave" video. Together, we can make "a better way" of treating cancer become a reality!  

Comments

Mr. Neidig, 
 
Read your comments twice and came inevitably to your comment about "direct small metallic particles specifically to cancer cells...". I wonder if you mean with or without big pharma's help. No way do we want big pharma's nose under the tent. John K. took them out of the picture with his patent, which has been proven to work without "targeting agents". Let's push for working the patent !!
Posted @ Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:49 AM by Bob Ott
Mark, you have lost my trust, as well as many other donors that wanted to support a procedure with ZERO chemo and radiation, which is exactly what Kanzius wanted. Do you even listen to your own words?? Your blog states: "...Imagine a world where the words “chemotherapy” and “radiation” are no longer synonymous with a cancer diagnosis... YES ! That is EXACTLY what we all imagine. So WHY have you sold out to Big Pharma and the FDA and gone the route of Chemo and Radiation for human trials instead of "staying the course" ??
Posted @ Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:17 PM by asp
Raising money for Kanzius research is a laudable goal, but the lack of new specific and tangible information on its progress is an impediment to support it. Are there any new data on the effectiveness of the Kanzius method (alone or in combination with other modalities) against metastatic cancer in vivo (animals)? 
The importance of a promising method of treatment is in its effectiveness against metastatic disease. Dr. J. Watson, a highly respected scientist and Nobel Prize winner, has just published what he considers “among my most important work since (the discovery of the DNA) double helix” on the current situation in view of currently incurable metastatic disease, that is attracting wide attention. Here is the online paper (You may need to highlight the link and paste it in your browser, if it makes it easier to open it):  
http://rsob.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/1/120144.full.pdf+html  
Posted @ Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:29 AM by Shaker E. Farhat, MSc, PhD(c)
Shaker Farhat: I was able to find the article and read it. Although I understood only about 1/100th of the technical babble since I have no background in chemistry or medicine, I did catch the articles conclusion, which greatly confused me. It basically said antioxidants may CAUSE more cancers than they prevent. Goes against ALL of what everyone says about antioxidants and how they are GOOD for you because they raise glutathione levels which then scavenge the bad free radicals. This article says they try to SUPPRESS glutathione to treat certain cancers. Here is quote: "In light of the 
recent data strongly hinting that much of late-stage cancer’s 
untreatability may arise from its possession of too many antioxidants, 
the time has come to seriously ask whether antioxidant 
use much more likely causes than prevents cancer..." So now I'm completely confused. Should I eat Blueberries or not!?!?!
Posted @ Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:46 PM by Jim
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics